It exhibits fine gothic and classical influence without becoming so large in scale. The stone construction obviously gives the structure a heavy appearance, yet it fits nicely within the context of the surrounding buildings - especially the Boston Public Library, which faces it from directly across the central plaza.
However, the John Hancock building seems - at first glance - to be so completely out of place when juxtaposed to Trinity Church. Not only are the construction types different, but the scale of the towering skyscraper dwarfs that of Trinity. The Hancock building also comprises very little ornamentation, and uses a repetetive pattern of window connections and mullions to create a grid-like facade of steel and glass. Whereas Trinity Church exhibits fine stone-work and craftsmanship, as well as highly ornate decoration.
However, when examined a bit more closely, it immediately becomes clear that the towering obelisque of glass and steel actually fits quite nicely within the context of Trinity. The glass of the structure reflects the environment around it to a point where it nearly disappears, and also provokes viewers into contemplating the surrounding area from a different point of view. The "room" that is created between Trinity Church and the Hancock building is small on the ground plane (it extends only as far as the blocks on which the buildings are constructed) yet extends infinitely in the vertical direction.
The tower of glass and steel, which opposes Trinity Church, actually seems to complement the verticality of the church spires across the street (whose purpose was to bring the structure closer to the heavens). As one looks upward to the top of the Hancock building,
1 comment:
Aksel, your sketches are improving and the analytical part is clear. Probably you need to scan them with more contrast to see them better. Please, try to locate all your assignments on one blog so we can see the progress in one page.
I m missing your assignment NÂș 2
Post a Comment